Saturday, 19 April 2025 13:23

Bluetooth vs SparkLink: Global vs Chinese Standards

The International SparkLink Wireless Short-Range Communication Alliance and Bluetooth SIG represent two distinct approaches to short-range wireless communication, shaped by differing strategic, technical, and geopolitical contexts. Here's a structured comparison:
1. Origins and Governance

Bluetooth SIG:

Founded in 1998 by Ericsson, Nokia, IBM, Intel, and Toshiba.
A global consortium with over 38,000 member companies, including major tech firms like Apple, Microsoft, and Qualcomm.
Governs Bluetooth standards (Classic and BLE) and certification processes.


SparkLink Alliance:

Established in 2021 in China, backed by entities like the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT).
Part of China's push for domestic technological self-reliance, with members likely including Huawei, ZTE, and other Chinese tech/automotive firms.
Focused on creating a unified Chinese standard for high-performance short-range communication.



2. Technical Specifications

Bluetooth:

Operates in 2.4 GHz ISM band.
Data rates up to 3 Mbps (Bluetooth 5.0+), with BLE optimized for low power.
Range: Up to 100m (Classic) or 40m (BLE).
Use cases: Audio devices, wearables, IoT sensors, and peripherals.


SparkLink:

Emphasizes ultra-low latency (sub-1ms) and high reliability....

继续阅读完整内容

请查看下方广告以解锁文章剩余内容

广告加载中...
Read 48361 times